ReviewCardiovascular toxicology2026
Micro- and Nanoplastics in Cardiovascular Toxicology: Human Tissue Detection, Clinical Phenotypes, and Adverse Outcome Signals.
Review in Cardiovascular toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) have emerged from a diffuse environmental concern to a plausible cardiovascular exposure with potential clinical relevance. The current evidence base is heterogeneous: human observational and tissue-detection studies have identified MNPs in blood, thrombi, atherosclerotic plaques, arterial tissue, and cardiac surgical specimens, whereas cell, organoid, and animal studies provide mechanistic plausibility for vascular inflammation, thrombosis, myocardial injury, remodeling, and electrophysiological disturbance. Key clinical signals now include polyethylene detection in 58.4% of carotid plaques and a reported 4.53-fold higher risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause death among patients with MNP-positive plaques in the landmark carotid plaque cohort. Accordingly, the central question is no longer only whether MNPs can induce oxidative stress or inflammation in isolated systems, but whether they may contribute to clinically recognizable cardiovascular phenotypes and adverse outcomes. In this review, we reframe the field from a mechanism-dominant narrative toward a clinically oriented synthesis integrating human specimen evidence, disease phenotypes, evidence calibration, analytical limitations, and translational implications. We summarize current human evidence for MNPs presence in circulation and diseased vascular tissues, examine phenotype-specific evidence for atherosclerosis, thrombosis and coagulation disturbance, myocardial injury and fibrotic remodeling, contractile dysfunction, electrophysiological abnormalities, and developmental cardiovascular toxicity, and distinguish these clinical signals from preclinical mechanistic support. Across these phenotypes, the most reproducible mechanisms involve endothelial injury, immunoinflammatory activation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and prothrombotic signaling. Overall, current evidence supports biological plausibility and clinically relevant associations rather than definitive causality, but the convergence of human tissue detection, phenotype-oriented experiments, and emerging clinical associations justifies considering MNPs as emerging cardiovascular risk modifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42489771What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.