ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Mixed Reality as a Tool for Congenital Heart Disease Case Management Discussions.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding congenital heart disease requires a 3D mental framework, yet clinicians typically rely on 2D imaging. Multi-disciplinary case management conference (CMC) discussions often involve review of complex anatomy utilizing cross-sectional imaging. Mixed reality (MR) offers immersive 3D visualization that may enhance these discussions. Our objectives were to demonstrate the feasibility of integrating MR-guided discussions into CMC and assess Heart Center perceptions of its use. This prospective, single-center study was conducted during multi-disciplinary CMCs. Baseline and post-presentation Likert-scale questionnaires were administered. EchoPixel True3D (Santa Clara, CA) was used to present 3D MR models from cardiac CT datasets. Participants used electronic glasses wirelessly linked to a 3D projector to view the MR models in conference, which were manipulated in real-time. On the baseline survey (n = 46), 67% agreed that complex cardiac anatomy is difficult to interpret with 2D imaging. Twelve MR cases were presented. On the post-survey (n = 100), 93% rated the MR model quality as good/excellent, 75% felt that MR improved their understanding of the cardiac anatomy, and 89% supported regular use of MR in CMC. Among surgeons and interventionalists, 82% reported improved procedural planning and 57% altered their procedural approach. Mixed reality imaging can be successfully incorporated into CMC presentations and discussions, with positive participant responses. MR provides a virtual 3D framework that closely replicates patient anatomy and supports pre-procedural planning and execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42489902What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.