Evidence mapPaperPMID 42489969Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2026

NAD⁺ biology and supplementation: From mechanisms to clinical perspectives.

Sergio Pandolfi, Charlye Ghezzi, Geir Björklund, Marco Metalla, Francesco Maria Paone, Salvatore Chirumbolo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sergio PandolfiHigh Master School of Oxygen-Ozone Therapy, Section Neurosurgery, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Charlye GhezziCouncil for Nutritional and Environmental Medicine, Mo i Rana, Norway.
Geir BjörklundCouncil for Nutritional and Environmental Medicine, Mo i Rana, Norway.
Marco MetallaCouncil for Nutritional and Environmental Medicine, Mo i Rana, Norway.
Francesco Maria PaoneUniversity of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore ChirumboloDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 8, Verona, 37134, Italy. salvatore.chirumbolo@univr.it.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1789-8307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the biological and clinical relevance of NAD⁺ supplementation using a combined review and mathematical modelling approach. NAD⁺ plays a central role in cellular energy metabolism, redox balance, and signaling pathways linked to aging, neurodegeneration, and metabolic health. Current evidence shows that oral NAD⁺ precursors such as nicotinamide riboside and nicotinamide mononucleotide can increase circulating NAD⁺ levels, although their clinical benefits remain variable and context-dependent. Intravenous NAD⁺ administration is less well characterized and lacks robust clinical validation. The modelling framework presented here highlights that NAD⁺ responses are nonlinear and influenced by factors such as dose, age, metabolic state, and route of administration. Rather than following a simple dose-response relationship, NAD⁺ supplementation appears to operate within a complex regulatory system involving feedback mechanisms and biological saturation. Overall, these findings emphasize the need for cautious interpretation of current data and for well-designed clinical studies to define effective and safe therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsNADAnimalsEnergy MetabolismHumansNiacinamideNicotinamide MononucleotideOxidation-ReductionPyridinium CompoundsSignal TransductionNADNiacinamidenicotinamide-beta-ribosideNicotinamide MononucleotidePyridinium CompoundsDosesInfusionNADNutraceuticalsPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID42489969
PMCPMC13395945

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.