ReviewThe oncologist2026
DNA damage response pathway alterations in urothelial carcinoma: a road to precision oncology or a dead-end street?
Review in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma ranks among the most common solid tumors and exhibits aggressive behavior, with limited survival in the metastatic setting despite recent therapeutic advances. Currently, 3 first-line systemic treatment options are supported by level IA evidence, yet no validated predictive biomarkers exist to guide selection among them. Alterations in DNA damage response (DDR) pathways occur in a substantial proportion of urothelial tumors and have emerged as potential predictive biomarkers of treatment sensitivity. This review examines the biological basis of DDR pathways and their implications in carcinogenesis, summarizes the frequency and spectrum of DDR gene alterations in urothelial carcinoma, and critically appraises the available evidence linking these alterations to responses to platinum-based chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and PARP inhibitors in both muscle-invasive and metastatic settings. Although retrospective data suggest associations between DDR alterations and improved outcomes with certain therapies, results across studies are heterogeneous, likely reflecting inconsistent definitions of DDR alterations, the variable functional impact of individual mutations, and differences in patient populations. We discuss these limitations and highlight the need for standardized criteria and prospective validation to determine whether DDR pathway alterations can be reliably integrated into clinical decision-making for patients with urothelial carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.