Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42490618›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental entomology2026

Anthropogenic factors are correlated with wing color variation in Colias (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) butterflies across the Toronto urbanization gradient.

Amanda Sabatino, Joshua P Jahner, S Eryn McFarlane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda SabatinoDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-4427-1335
Joshua P JahnerDepartment of Biology, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8121-6783
S Eryn McFarlaneDepartment of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

NSERC Discovery Grant and the York University Junior Faculty Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization, or interbreeding between 2 previously diverged populations, is increasing due to human influences on the environment through creating new niches and enhancing hybrid fitness. Rates of hybridization might be increasing particularly quickly among urban species, especially those that are known to be sensitive to environmental disturbances. Butterflies are one such taxa, as some species are commonly found in urban areas, despite being sensitive indicators of environmental variation. For example, Colias philodice Godart and C. eurytheme Boisduval (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) hybridize when their ranges are in contact or overlap and are commonly found in large cities throughout North America. However, it is an open question how variation in urbanization might affect variation in hybridization. Using wild Colias across a gradient of urbanization in Toronto, Ontario, we tested how the variation in Colias color, as an indicator of hybridization, relates to human disturbance and urbanization. We created an objective numeric classification for both C. eurytheme and C. philodice, against which we categorized Colias samples. We found that some of the metrics, including distance to road, ordinal date, and number of pedestrians affect the variation in Colias color, suggesting that urbanization affects Colias coloration, and potentially rates of hybridization, in Toronto. This means that human disturbance of the environment could be affecting Colias rates of hybridization.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsButterfliesHybridization, GeneticPigmentationUrbanizationWings, AnimalAnimalsColorOntariocolor classificationenvironmental variationhuman disturbancehybridizationsulphur butterflies

Identifiers

PMID42490618
PMCPMC13394692

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.