Evidence mapPaperPMID 42490813Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Bias-reduced Regression Analysis in Nutrition (BRAiN) index: self-reported diet and predicted cognitive function.

Federica Conti, Kevin A Gluck, Andrea Stocco, Thomas R Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Federica ContiHuman Performance Center, Parker University, Dallas, TX, United States.
Kevin A GluckInstitute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pensacola, FL, United States.
Andrea StoccoDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Thomas R WoodInstitute for Human and Machine Cognition, Pensacola, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence suggests the development of age-related dementia is strongly associated with numerous modifiable risk factors, particularly lifestyle behaviors such as diet, sleep, and physical activity. Yet, when exploring the dietary predictors of cognitive function, many scoring systems apply linear scales to eating patterns in a way that prioritizes simplicity over predictive accuracy. Methods: The present study employed a cross-validated elastic net regression algorithm on a large dataset of self-reported dietary data ( Results: Bias-reduced Regression Analysis in Nutrition (BRAiN) scores were computed, and their predictive performance in held-out data exceeded that of a conventional linear dietary scoring approach based on available MIND-related variables (Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay). Non-linear relationships between intake level and cognition were noted for most foods, with greater consumption of animal and vegetable proteins, vegetables, nuts and seeds, and whole grains, being positively associated with cognitive function, while the regular consumption of both refined fats and refined carbohydrates was negatively associated with cognitive function. Discussion: Shifts in dietary patterns by age suggested that some relationships between diet and cognitive function in nutritional epidemiology may be confounded by age-related dietary trends. Our data-driven model can be easily adjusted over time to reflect potential shifts in dietary practices at the population level and inform relevant health authorities in the timely design of effective nutritional recommendations and guidelines to prevent or slow down the onset of age-related cognitive decline.

Indexed as

age-related cognitive declinedementianutritional interventionspopulation dataprediction model

Identifiers

PMID42490813
PMCPMC13375470

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.