ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Nebulised Chinese herbal medicine for paediatric pneumonia: a meta-analysis.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of nebulised Chinese herbal medicine as an adjunctive therapy for paediatric pneumonia. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, VIP and Chinese Biomedical Literature electronic databases between inception and 1 November 2025. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating nebulised Chinese herbal medicine as an adjunctive treatment for paediatric pneumonia were included. Two reviewers independently performed literature selection and data extraction and assessed the methodological quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software, and publication bias was assessed using RevMan 5.4. Results: Seventeen RCTs involving 1,764 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with conventional Western therapy alone, the combination with nebulised Chinese herbal medicine significantly improved the total clinical effective rate [odds ratio = 3.24, 95% CI: (2.24, 4.68), Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that nebulised Chinese herbal medicine combined with conventional Western therapy can significantly improve clinical efficacy, accelerate symptom resolution and shorten the disease course in children with pneumonia. However, due to methodological limitations in the included studies, these findings warrant further validation in larger, rigorously designed trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.