Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491071›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026

Synthetic CT generation from cone-beam CT using deep learning for head-and-neck adaptive radiotherapy.

Marcos M Sánchez, Carlos F Gracia, Concepción H Martínez, Moisés S Beltrán, David G Riñon, Giorgia Yang, Raúl S López, Pablo G Fernández, Iván A Delgado, Daniel R Navarrete and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Marcos M SánchezHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos F GraciaHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Concepción H MartínezHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Moisés S BeltránHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
David G RiñonHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Giorgia YangHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Raúl S LópezHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo G FernándezHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Iván A DelgadoHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel R NavarreteHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel B MirandaHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro P MarcosHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Rocio G RoblesHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Alonso L De Los RíosHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Marta R RoldánHospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Synthetic computed tomography generation from cone-beam computed tomography enables adaptive radiotherapy on conventional linear accelerators, but its clinical implementation is limited. We developed and validated a deep learning model for synthetic computed tomography generation in head-and-neck patients, including regions beyond the cone-beam computed tomography field of view, and evaluated its accuracy for adaptive radiotherapy workflows. Materials and methods: A UNet3+ generative adversarial network with multi-component losses was trained on 148 patients (90 training, 38 validation, 20 independent testing). Anatomical concordance, intensity fidelity versus the deformably registered planning computed tomography, and dose recalculation in a commercial treatment planning system (global gamma at 3%/2 mm and 2%/2 mm, 10% dose threshold) were assessed. Results: In Hounsfield units, mean absolute error was 49.9 ± 11.0 globally, 40.2 ± 8.2 inside the cone-beam field of view (mean error 0.2 ± 2.7) and 61.4 ± 19.0 outside. Mean differences in planning target volume dose metrics were < 1.6% (maximum 5.1%), and mean gamma pass rates were 99.0% (3%, 2 mm) and 98.7% (2%, 2 mm). Surface Dice at a 2-mm tolerance was 0.81 ± 0.06 (Dice 0.97 ± 0.01; mean surface distance 1.07 ± 0.31 mm; volume similarity 0.99 ± 0.01). Conclusions: The proposed model generated accurate, anatomically coherent synthetic computed tomography from cone-beam computed tomography, including realistic reconstruction beyond the cone-beam field of view, supporting the feasibility for daily adaptive-radiotherapy dose recalculation on conventional linear accelerators and motivating prospective clinical evaluation.

Indexed as

adaptive radiotherapycone-beam CTdose recalculationgenerative adversarial networkSynthetic CT

Identifiers

PMID42491071
PMCPMC13375924

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.