ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Food insecurity in college students: a qualitative exploration of the multiple domains.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To help address student basic needs, universities may benefit from screening students using a tool that captures multiple food insecurity domains. The purpose of this study is to explore college students' experiences related to the various domains of food insecurity (quantitative, qualitative, social, and psychological). This qualitative research was conducted at a Midwestern public research university through semi-structured interviews with embedded surveys that measured food insecurity. 23 undergraduate and graduate students participated. Three major themes emerged from the interviews. First, students were consistently spending time and energy navigating ways to secure their next meal, which was reflected through experiences in all four domains (quantitative, qualitative, social, and psychological). Second, differences in resource restrictions and accessibility influenced the consistency and amount of food accessible to student which impacted quantity of food received, held psychological consequences for students, and affected decisions they made socially. Finally, students felt the quality of food available to them negatively impacted their health both short- and long-term which was related to negative psychological consequences such as added stress and anxiety. Widely used tools such as the USDA 10-item screener mainly capture the quantity of food available and more extreme forms of food insecurity. However, as seen in the interviews, many students may still be experiencing varying levels of food insecurity and barriers (i.e. social stigma) related to the qualitative, social, and psychological domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.