Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42491237›Full record

ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2026

Brief mindfulness intervention prior to simulated central venous access device insertion: A pilot randomised feasibility study.

Denis O'Dwyer, Ashwin Subramaniam, Dean McKenzie, Tony King, Laven Padayachee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denis O'DwyerDepartment of Intensive Care, Epworth Hospital, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.
Ashwin SubramaniamDepartment of Intensive Care, Epworth Hospital, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.
Dean McKenzieDepartment of Intensive Care, Epworth Hospital, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.
Tony KingDepartment of Intensive Care, Epworth Hospital, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.
Laven PadayacheeDepartment of Intensive Care, Epworth Hospital, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute stress impairs attention and procedural performance in high-acuity environments. Whether brief mindfulness-based interventions are feasible and affect performance in intensive care unit (ICU) simulation training is unknown. Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of a brief mindfulness-based intervention before simulated ultrasound-guided central venous access device (CVAD) insertion. Design setting and participants: Single-centre pilot randomised feasibility study at a tertiary ICU simulation centre. Twelve of thirteen ICU registrars with prior CVAD experience were randomised 1:1 to mindfulness or an active control. Intervention: A 3-min recorded mindfulness meditation focused on breath awareness and attentional regulation, or a time-matched active control (standardised observation chart review), delivered immediately prior to simulation. Main outcome measures: Feasibility thresholds: recruitment ≥80%, adherence ≥90%, data completeness ≥95%, and assessor blinding. Exploratory outcomes included procedural performance (checklist, global rating scale, and total score), physiological arousal (heart rate and blood pressure), psychological state anxiety (STAI-State), confidence, and cognitive workload (NASA-TLX). Results: All feasibility thresholds were met (recruitment [92%], adherence, and data completeness [100%, respectively]; blinding maintained). Mindfulness produced greater transient reductions in heart rate (-12.4 vs -5.3 beats/min) and systolic blood pressure (-13.5 vs -3.7 mmHg). STAI-State decreased in the mindfulness group but was unchanged in controls. Postsimulation confidence was higher in the mindfulness group (mean 13.7 vs 11.8). Procedural performance was numerically lower in the mindfulness group across all domains (total score 41.3 vs 52.0), and critical procedural errors were more frequent (4/6 vs 1/6). Confidence intervals were wide throughout, reflecting the small sample. Conclusions: A brief preprocedural mindfulness intervention was feasible and transiently reduced physiological arousal and state anxiety, but did not improve procedural performance; scores were numerically lower in the mindfulness group and critical errors were more frequent, though chance imbalance cannot be excluded given the small sample. These findings support progression to a larger, multicentre, adequately powered trial.

Indexed as

Cognitive workloadMindfulnessPhysiological arousalProcedural performanceRandomised pilot study

Identifiers

PMID42491237
PMCPMC13376986

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.