ArticleFrontiers in aging2026
Effects of an 8-month intergenerational adapted taekwondo training on functional fitness in senior novice practitioners.
Article in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Aging is commonly associated with declines in functional fitness that can be effectively attenuated through mid-to long-term, multifaceted physical activity. However, physical activity performed by older adults often aims to maintain, rather than improve, physical fitness. Martial arts are increasingly recognized as suitable multimodal interventions for older adults, as they integrate balance, flexibility, motor control, and cognitive engagement. Within this framework, taekwondo may represent a feasible activity to preserve and enhance functional fitness. Moreover, intergenerational approaches (combining younger and older participants in shared training sessions) may further support adherence, motivation, and social-cognitive stimulation. Despite this potential, long-term programs involving novice older adults remain largely unexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of an 8-month intergenerational adapted taekwondo training program for older novice practitioners. Methods: This single-arm pre-post observational study used a volunteer convenience sample without a control group. Twenty-one seniors (14 females and 7 males: 63-83 years) participated twice-weekly 60-min taekwondo training for 8 months with one weekly session performed together with 21 children (6-13 years). The "American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance" test battery was used to assess the seniors' functional fitness before and after the intervention based on flexibility, upper-body strength, aerobic endurance, agility/dynamic balance, and coordination. Linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures examined time and sex effects. Results: Significant (p < 0.05) improvements were observed in aerobic endurance and coordination, with normative compliance increasing from 14.3% to 33.3% and from 66.7% to 95.2%, respectively. No significant changes were found in upper body strength, agility/dynamic, or flexibility, though males outperformed females in the Chair sit-and-reach and endurance tests. Discussion: Despite the limited sample size and the lack of a control group, which limit causal inference and generalizability, the program was associated with improvements in selected functional fitness domains, particularly aerobic endurance and coordination, whereas flexibility, agility/dynamic balance, and upper-body strength did not change significantly, suggesting that intergenerational adapted taekwondo may represent a feasible long-term physical activity option for novice older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.