Evidence mapPaperPMID 42491449Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2026

Modelling gestational weight gain trajectories and risk of adverse birth outcomes using super imposition by translation and rotation: findings from two Brazilian cohort studies.

Audêncio Victor, Liania A Luzia, Tamiris Ramos Silva, Aldaisa Pereira Lopes, Rebecca E Penzias, Isabel Oliveira Aires, Patrícia Helen Rondó, Eric O Ohuma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Audêncio VictorPublic Health Postgraduate Program, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil.
Liania A LuziaNutrition Department, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil.
Tamiris Ramos SilvaNutrition Department, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil.
Aldaisa Pereira LopesNutrition Department, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil.
Rebecca E PenziasFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Isabel Oliveira AiresNutrition Department, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil.
Patrícia Helen RondóPublic Health Postgraduate Program, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 715 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, 01246-904, Brazil.
Eric O OhumaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gestational weight gain (GWG) is a key determinant of maternal and neonatal health, yet there are no clear recommendations for tracking GWG trajectories, beyond total amount, in routine care. We aimed to characterise GWG trajectories in terms of both amount and velocity and examine their associations with adverse neonatal outcomes in two Brazilian cohorts, using INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21st) centiles. Methods: We analysed 3770 pregnant women in two population-based cohorts in São Paulo state, Brazil: Jundiaí (n = 965; 1997-2000; median age 24 years [IQR 20-29]; 21% non-White) and Araraquara (n = 2805; 2017-2024; median age 27 years [IQR 22-32]; 54% non-White). GWG trajectories were modelled using the Super Imposition by Translation and Rotation (SITAR) method. Predicted GWG amount and velocity were classified against IG-21st 25th and 75th centiles for women with normal weight. Associations with low birthweight (LBW), macrosomia, preterm birth (PTB), and 5-min Apgar score <7 were estimated using multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance estimation. Findings: SITAR explained 85.6% of GWG variance in Jundiaí and 84.0% in Araraquara. GWG below the 25th centile was associated with LBW (RR 2.14; 95% CI 1.47-3.11) and PTB (RR 1.95; 95% CI 1.20-3.17); above the 75th centile, with macrosomia (RR 2.58; 95% CI 1.40-4.77). GWG velocity above the 75th centile was strongly associated with macrosomia (RR 3.31; 1.58-6.92). Interpretation: SITAR provided a parsimonious description of GWG trajectories and identified clinically relevant deviations in amount and velocity. IG-21st 25th and 75th centiles offer risk stratification identifying those most at risk of poor neonatal outcomes. Funding: São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP).

Indexed as

BrazilEpidemiologyGestational weight gainGrowth trajectoriesMaternal healthSITAR model

Identifiers

PMID42491449
PMCPMC13377129

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.