ArticleCurrent addiction reports2025
Smartphone Apps for Problematic Pornography Use: A Review of Content and Quality.
Article in Current addiction reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of review: Problematic pornography use can lead to negative psychosocial consequences such as unrealistic sexual expectations, relationship difficulties, and psychological distress. While efficacious psychosocial treatments exist, there remain barriers to accessing treatment, some of which may be circumvented using mobile health phone applications (mHealth apps). The purpose of this review was to characterize the features and quality of publicly available mHealth apps designed to help individuals with problematic pornography use. Recent findings: Twenty-three iPhone apps associated with problematic pornography use were identified and characterized using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). The most common features included tracking days abstinent, goal setting, and psychoeducation regarding problematic pornography use. Content on mindfulness/meditation, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or tips/strategies for managing problematic pornography use was found in less than half of the apps, even though apps that incorporated such content had higher scores on the MARS Engagement subscale than apps that did not incorporate such content. Exploratory studies indicated that "star" ratings of the apps on the App Store were not significantly correlated with app quality or the absence/presence of specific features. Summary: Our results suggest that publicly available mHealth apps for problematic pornography use that feature mindfulness/meditation, cognitive-behavioral skills or strategies may be engaging and of high quality. However, these apps comprise the minority of publicly available apps, and their quality may not be apparent based on "star" ratings in app stores. This review may inform the development and optimization of mHealth apps to support people with problematic pornography use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.