ArticleiScience2026
How urban green spaces influence adolescent mental health in urban fringe areas: A cultural ecosystem services perspective.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While urban green spaces are known to support psychological restoration, their benefits for adolescents in urban fringe areas and the pathways of cultural ecosystem services (CESs) remain unclear. Using multi-source data and structural equation modeling, the findings reveal that: (1) CESs improve mental health directly and via social interaction; (2) green view index and sky view factor positively affect mental health, while normalized difference vegetation index shows a negative effect; (3) point of interest density in 500-m park buffers exhibits functional differentiation: catering, corporate, and transportation facilities enhance mental health, lifestyle services reduce it, and commercial-residential facilities show no effect; (4) social interaction and neighborhood satisfaction are key mediators; healthcare facilities have the strongest total effect but a direct pathway, with effects varying by type and usage pattern. This study emphasizes that urban fringe planning should prioritize cultural services and social integration over mere green space metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.