ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Comparative analysis of two pedagogical approaches (E-Learning and modular learning) for teaching integrated sexual and reproductive health to nursing students.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSexual and reproductive health (SRH) education is an essential component of nursing curricula; however, optimal teaching methodologies are still debated. This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of e-learning and modular learning approaches in improving the knowledge and decision-making skills regarding Integrated Sexual and Reproductive Health (ISRH) among nursing students. MATERIALS AND
methodsA quasiexperimental pretest-posttest design was used with 68 nursing students from a B.Sc. Nursing (4
resultsSignificant improvements in knowledge scores were observed in both the e-learning (mean pretest: 14.97 ± 3.88; post-test: 20.06 ± 3.95; ((t (62) =3.21,
conclusionE-learning and modular learning methods were equally effective in improving nursing students' ISRH knowledge and decision-making skills. Institutions may choose between these approaches based on resource availability and learner preferences without compromising educational outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.