ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
The WISH 2.0 Intervention for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: There is a critical need for acceptable, scalable, and mechanistically targeted behavioral health interventions for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), known as brain-gut behavior therapies (BGBTs). Although positive psychology (PP) interventions, which focus on the cultivation of positive psychological well-being, have been linked to improved health outcomes across diverse medical populations, they have not yet been investigated in IBS. To address this gap, we developed WISH (Well-Being in IBS: Strengths and Happiness), a novel, 9-week, phone-delivered PP-based BGBT for individuals with IBS. Objective: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary effects, and candidate gut-brain mechanisms of a 9-week phone-delivered PP intervention for IBS compared with a time- and attention-matched educational control. Methods: The WISH 2.0 trial is a parallel-group, 9-week pilot RCT that aims to enroll 50 adults meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS. Participants are randomized (1:1), stratified by IBS subtype and gender, to either the WISH 2.0 intervention or an educational control condition. Both conditions consist of 9 weekly 30-minute phone sessions accompanied by weekly manualized exercises. Primary outcomes are feasibility (proportion completing ≥6 of 9 sessions) and acceptability (weekly ease and utility ratings). Secondary outcomes include WISH 2.0's preliminary effects on health-related, health behavior, and psychological outcomes, assessed at 4 time points: baseline, intervention midpoint, the postintervention assessment, and the 3-month postintervention assessment. Candidate gut-brain mechanisms that might underlie WISH 2.0's effects, including changes in autonomic function (heart rate variability), interoception (self-report measure), gene expression (whole transcriptome RNA sequencing), and immune system activity (serum inflammatory biomarkers), will be explored before and after the intervention. Results: The trial was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board and prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in March 2025. Funding was awarded in June 2025. Following a study start-up period, recruitment commenced in October 2025 and is ongoing. As of July 2026, 20 participants have been enrolled. Study completion is anticipated in August 2028. Conclusions: This trial will determine the feasibility and acceptability of WISH 2.0, a novel PP intervention for IBS. Comparative results between WISH 2.0 and an educational control, including the possibility of equivalent outcomes, will provide important mechanistic insights and facilitate further optimization of BGBTs for IBS, informing a future fully powered efficacy trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.