Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42492091›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

The WISH 2.0 Intervention for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Elizabeth N Madva, Jeff C Huffman, Helen Burton-Murray, Emmett McGranaghan, Megan Bidgood, Jenny Y Gan, Benjamin Wasserman, Emily H Feig, Brian Healy, Kyle Staller and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Elizabeth N MadvaHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0000-0003-2194-2032
Jeff C HuffmanHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0000-0002-2565-9288
Helen Burton-MurrayHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-3256
Emmett McGranaghanHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0009-0009-7336-8942
Megan BidgoodHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0009-0001-4724-7380
Jenny Y GanHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0000-0001-6510-540X
Benjamin WassermanHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0009-0001-0622-3614
Emily H FeigHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0000-0001-6152-0526
Brian HealyDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5272-2425
Kyle StallerHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0000-0003-4925-4290
Bonney ReedDivision of Behavioral & Mental Health, Emory + Children's Pediatric Institute, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1808-6132
Roberta ScloccoDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8837-5218
Sami S AmrDepartment of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0927-6057
Stephen BartelsHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0000-0002-7985-2905
Braden KuoDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7228-7317
Laurie KeeferGastroenterology and Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4779-8593
Christopher M CelanoHarvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States, 1-617-726-2000.ORCID 0000-0003-0547-2851

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUM1TR004408 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Lindsey Robert Baden, Lee Marshall Nadler · 2023 to 2026
$43.3M
A Positive Psychology Intervention for Irritable Bowel SyndromeK23DK138875 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Elizabeth Noble Madva · 2025 to 2026
$394k
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004408NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK138875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a critical need for acceptable, scalable, and mechanistically targeted behavioral health interventions for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), known as brain-gut behavior therapies (BGBTs). Although positive psychology (PP) interventions, which focus on the cultivation of positive psychological well-being, have been linked to improved health outcomes across diverse medical populations, they have not yet been investigated in IBS. To address this gap, we developed WISH (Well-Being in IBS: Strengths and Happiness), a novel, 9-week, phone-delivered PP-based BGBT for individuals with IBS. Objective: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, preliminary effects, and candidate gut-brain mechanisms of a 9-week phone-delivered PP intervention for IBS compared with a time- and attention-matched educational control. Methods: The WISH 2.0 trial is a parallel-group, 9-week pilot RCT that aims to enroll 50 adults meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS. Participants are randomized (1:1), stratified by IBS subtype and gender, to either the WISH 2.0 intervention or an educational control condition. Both conditions consist of 9 weekly 30-minute phone sessions accompanied by weekly manualized exercises. Primary outcomes are feasibility (proportion completing ≥6 of 9 sessions) and acceptability (weekly ease and utility ratings). Secondary outcomes include WISH 2.0's preliminary effects on health-related, health behavior, and psychological outcomes, assessed at 4 time points: baseline, intervention midpoint, the postintervention assessment, and the 3-month postintervention assessment. Candidate gut-brain mechanisms that might underlie WISH 2.0's effects, including changes in autonomic function (heart rate variability), interoception (self-report measure), gene expression (whole transcriptome RNA sequencing), and immune system activity (serum inflammatory biomarkers), will be explored before and after the intervention. Results: The trial was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board and prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov in March 2025. Funding was awarded in June 2025. Following a study start-up period, recruitment commenced in October 2025 and is ongoing. As of July 2026, 20 participants have been enrolled. Study completion is anticipated in August 2028. Conclusions: This trial will determine the feasibility and acceptability of WISH 2.0, a novel PP intervention for IBS. Comparative results between WISH 2.0 and an educational control, including the possibility of equivalent outcomes, will provide important mechanistic insights and facilitate further optimization of BGBTs for IBS, informing a future fully powered efficacy trial.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyIrritable Bowel SyndromePsychology, PositiveAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot Projectsdisorders of gut-brain interactionfunctional gastrointestinal disordersirritable bowel syndromepositive psychologypsychological resilience

Identifiers

PMID42492091
PMCPMC13395429

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.