ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2026
Green ultrasound‑assisted extraction of bioactive polyphenols from Inonotus hispidus: Sustainable process with enhanced yield and antioxidant activity.
Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) has emerged as a green and efficient alternative to conventional extraction methods, primarily due to the acoustic cavitation phenomena that minimize solvent consumption and processing time. This study systematically optimized a UAE process for maximized recovery of total polyphenols from Inonotus hispidus. UAE was conducted using a KS-700XDS power-adjustable ultrasonic bath at 50 kHz. In preliminary comparisons, UAE demonstrated more efficacy, affording a total polyphenol content (TPC) of 18.74 mg/g, which exceeded the yields of heat reflux extraction and stirring-assisted extraction by 8.70 % and 14.62 %, respectively. Response surface methodology was subsequently employed to determine the optimal extraction parameters, which were established as an extraction time of 95 min, an ethanol concentration of 60 %, an ultrasonic power of 150 W, and a temperature of 65 ℃. Under these optimized conditions, the experimental TPC reached 25.46 mg/g, representing a 35.86 % increase over the pre-optimized value. A greenness evaluation using the AGREE metric yielded a score of 0.76 for UAE, confirming its environmental sustainability. Antioxidant assays demonstrated that the optimized extract exhibited significantly enhanced radical-scavenging activities and ferric reducing power compared to the unoptimized extract. These findings highlight the critical role of ultrasonic-controlled parameters in maximizing polyphenol yields and validate the proposed method as a highly efficient and sustainable approach for fungal material valorization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.