Evidence mapPaperPMID 42492485Full record

ArticleJMIR aging2026

Usability of the Coach-Supported Dementia Prevention App ENHANCE (Tailored Intervention for Brain Health and Cognitive Enrichment) in Older Adults: 1-Week Mixed Methods Study.

Tsz Kiu Clare Yu, Gill Livingston, Richard Boczko, Kealan Forristal, James Jamison, Carl Leckstein, Vrushti Mehta, Hee Kyung Park, Aneesha Singh, Andrew Sommerlad and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tsz Kiu Clare YuDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, United Kingdom, +44 20 3987 2384.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7771-5838
Gill LivingstonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, United Kingdom, +44 20 3987 2384.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6741-5516
Richard BoczkoFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6948-8270
Kealan ForristalSocial, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, King's College London, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5498-0006
James JamisonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, United Kingdom, +44 20 3987 2384.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6452-0561
Carl LecksteinDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8363-5735
Vrushti MehtaDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, United Kingdom, +44 20 3987 2384.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9267-7022
Hee Kyung ParkDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, United Kingdom, +44 20 3987 2384.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-0059
Aneesha SinghUCL Interaction Centre, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0835-5802
Andrew SommerladDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, United Kingdom, +44 20 3987 2384.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8895-7055
Sergi G CostafredaDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, United Kingdom, +44 20 3987 2384.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6914-086X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Multidomain dementia-prevention interventions delivered via apps have the potential to reach large populations. However, existing trials have tended to recruit more socioeconomically advantaged participants, raising concerns that the resulting interventions may be less usable for older adults from minority ethnic, lower educational, or lower socioeconomic backgrounds, who are at higher risk of dementia. The Tailored Intervention for Brain Health and Cognitive Enrichment (ENHANCE) app was designed to address this by prioritizing accessibility and engagement across diverse user groups. Objective: This study evaluated the usability and user experience of the ENHANCE prototype during a 1-week at-home supported-use test and explored factors influencing use and engagement among older adults. Methods: We purposively recruited adults aged 60-80 years without dementia for a 1-week mixed methods usability evaluation through community settings, including groups underrepresented in dementia-prevention trials. Participants had at least 1 of 10 prespecified dementia risk factors, attended a face-to-face onboarding session with a coach, used the app at home for 7 days with ongoing coach support, and completed a posttest interview and satisfaction survey. We analyzed quantitative data, including app usage metrics and survey responses descriptively, and used reflexive thematic analysis of qualitative data from onboarding sessions, posttest interviews, coaching calls, and in-app messages. Results: Ten participants participated in the study. The mean age was 68 (SD 6) years, and 7 were females. Participants represented a wide range of deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation deciles: mean 4, SD 2, range 1-8), with 6 from ethnic minority backgrounds. All met prespecified minimum-use targets (watching a module video, completing a check-in, and playing assigned games at least once). Many demonstrated additional voluntary engagement: 5 rewatched the risk factor video, 7 used the in-app messaging feature, and among the 5 participants with the hypertension module, blood pressure was logged on an average of 5 out of 7 days. Survey responses indicated high satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and ease of use; 9 participants intended to continue using the app and would recommend it to peers. Qualitative analysis identified engagement facilitators, including rewarding game design, familiar interfaces, appropriately challenging gameplay, consistent virtual rewards, trusted expert information combined with peer stories, and coach support. Barriers included unclear visual cues, insufficient accommodation of motor or sensory impairments, and visual discomfort in some games. Conclusions: Older adults found the ENHANCE prototype usable, acceptable, and engaging over 1 week. Human coaching, inclusive design, and integration of expert and peer narratives were highlighted as key engagement drivers. These findings support further feasibility testing to examine longer-term engagement and provide design insights for more inclusive digital health interventions.

Indexed as

DementiaMobile ApplicationsAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive EnhancementFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairescognitive trainingdementia preventionmHealtholder adultsunderserved populationsusability testinguser experience

Identifiers

PMID42492485
PMCPMC13395424

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.