ReviewChinese medical journal2026
Recent advances in allergen immunotherapy.
Review in Chinese medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAllergen immunotherapy (AIT) remains the only disease-modifying treatment for immunoglobulin (Ig) E-mediated allergic diseases, including allergic rhinitis (AR), asthma, food allergy, and atopic dermatitis (AD). This review provides a comprehensive update on recent advances in AIT, focusing on immunological mechanisms, novel vaccines, biomarkers, clinical outcomes across different diseases, and emerging combination strategies with biologics. We discussed the pivotal roles of regulatory T and B cells, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), and blocking antibodies (immunoglobulin G4 [IgG4], immunoglobulin A [IgA]) in establishing long-term tolerance. Novel allergen vaccines-including recombinant and hypoallergenic derivatives, virus-like particle (VLP) conjugates, and transgenic peptide vaccines-aim to improve safety and efficacy. We critically evaluate current biomarkers for predicting and monitoring AIT response, such as the allergen-specific IgE (sIgE)/total immunoglobulin E (tIgE) ratio, basophil activation test, and cellular markers. Clinical evidence supports AIT efficacy in asthma, AR, and AD, with emerging applications in food allergies. Furthermore, combining AIT with biologics (e.g., anti-IgE and anti-interleukin [IL]-4/IL-4 receptor [IL-4R]) shows promise in enhancing safety and efficacy, particularly in severe asthma. Despite these advances, challenges remain in patient selection, treatment duration, and extract standardization. Future research should prioritize predictive biomarkers, short-course regimens, and synergistic biologic-AIT approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.