ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
A sex-specific perspective on coronary microvascular dysfunction in HFpEF: from vascular to myocardial disease.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heart Failure with Reduced versus Preserved Ejection Fraction: Molecular Mechanisms, Immunologic Pathways, Current Therapies, and Future Directions.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most prevalent form of heart failure and is characterized by high morbidity, limited therapeutic options, and marked biological heterogeneity. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has emerged as a central pathophysiological mechanism linking cardiometabolic comorbidities to myocardial remodeling and clinical HFpEF phenotypes. Impaired coronary flow reserve, endothelial dysfunction, reduced nitric oxide bioavailability, and microvascular rarefaction contribute to myocardial stiffening, energetic inefficiency, and ultimately diastolic dysfunction, often preceding overt structural heart disease in the setting of HFpEF. Notably, HFpEF disproportionately affects females, yet the biological mechanisms underlying this sex difference remain incompletely understood. Accumulating evidence suggests that sex-specific differences in vascular biology, immune-metabolic signaling, hormonal regulation, and myocardial-vascular coupling modulate susceptibility to CMD and influence the progression from vascular dysfunction to myocardial disease. Females exhibit a higher prevalence of CMD in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease, distinct inflammatory and metabolic profiles, and accelerated vascular and ventricular stiffening, particularly after menopause. In contrast, males more frequently display eccentric remodeling and obstructive epicardial coronary disease. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the mechanistic role of CMD in HFpEF, with a specific focus on sex-specific biological pathways that shape disease trajectory. Understanding how sex modifies CMD may inform improved diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, and the development of precision-based therapeutic approaches in HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42493631What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.