ReviewHeart failure reviews2026
Dyspnea in heart failure: pathophysiology, clinical assessment, and evidence from clinical trials.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dyspnea is a key symptom of heart failure (HF), particularly in its acute form, where it represents the most common cause of hospitalization. Although traditionally attributed to pulmonary congestion, dyspnea in HF is a multidimensional phenomenon resulting from complex interactions among elevated cardiac filling pressures, hemodynamic alterations, fluid redistribution, impaired gas exchange, activation of mechano- and chemoreceptors, and maladaptive neurohormonal activation. Comorbidities, including chronic lung disease, obesity, cachexia, renal dysfunction, anemia, and chronic inflammation, further modulate symptom perception and lower the threshold for its occurrence. In this review, we synthesize current knowledge on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying dyspnea in HF, emphasizing its heterogeneity and the complex interplay between hemodynamics, ventilatory regulation, and peripheral factors. We discuss available dyspnea assessment tools, highlighting their strengths and methodological limitations in clinical practice and randomized trials. Despite the use of standardized scales, dyspnea remains a subjective and dynamically evolving symptom. Data from large clinical trials in acute HF indicate that early improvement in dyspnea is common but does not translate into reduced mortality or rehospitalization, whereas residual dyspnea identifies patients at higher risk of adverse events. A better understanding of its multidimensional pathophysiology, measurement limitations, and prognostic significance has important implications for the interpretation of clinical trial results and for optimizing the assessment and management of this fundamental symptom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.