Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494109›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

The limits of bio-molecular modeling with large language models: a cross-scale evaluation.

Yaxin Xu, Yue Zhou, Tianyu Zhao, Zhengyu Ma, Fengwei An, Zhixiang Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yaxin XuCollege of Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0009-0001-0071-2679
Yue ZhouDepartment of Advanced Computing, Pengcheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2771-0144
Tianyu ZhaoLingQiong AI Lab, Shanghai Smart Logic Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200443, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3121-6042
Zhengyu MaDepartment of Advanced Computing, Pengcheng Laboratory, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Fengwei AnCollege of Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Zhixiang RenLingQiong AI Lab, Shanghai Smart Logic Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200443, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4104-3790

Funding

Guangdong S&T Programme 2024B0101010003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe modeling of bio-molecular system across molecular scales remains a central challenge in scientific research. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to bio-molecular discovery, yet systematic evaluation across multi-scale biological problems and rigorous assessment of their tool-augmented capabilities remain limited.

resultsWe reveal a systematic gap between LLM performance and mechanistic understanding through the proposed cross-scale bio-molecular benchmark: BioMol-LLM-Bench, a unified framework comprising 26 downstream tasks that covers 4 distinct difficulty levels, and computational tools are integrated for a more comprehensive evaluation. Evaluation on 13 representative models reveals 4 benchmark-specific observations: chain-of-thought-style training does not consistently improve performance on the evaluated biological tasks; the evaluated hybrid mamba-attention model shows strong performance on long bio-molecular sequence tasks; supervised fine-tuned models show task-specific specialization with reduced performance in some general settings; and current LLMs perform better on classification tasks than on challenging regression tasks under this benchmark setting. AVAILABILITY: Source code is available at https://github.com/AI-HPC-Research-Team/BioMol-LLM-Bench.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyLarge Language ModelsModels, MolecularSoftware

Identifiers

PMID42494109
PMCPMC13457088

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.