ReviewPhysiological reports2026
Friend or foe: Face masks in patients with COPD at high altitude.
Review in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-altitude environments impose unique physiological challenges due to reduced barometric pressure and lower inspired oxygen partial pressure, raising concerns about the safety of face mask use in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. While evidence at sea level shows that surgical and N95 masks modestly impair gas exchange-slightly reducing oxygen uptake, oxygen saturation-they consistently increase perceived exertion, dyspnea, and fatigue. Limited studies conducted under hypobaric conditions-typically involving small sample sizes, brief mask-wearing periods, and healthy participants. However, data at higher altitudes and in patients with COPD remain scarce. Emerging epidemiological evidence suggests that COPD prevalence may decrease with increasing altitude, yet high-altitude residence can alter pathophysiology and could increase vulnerability to hypoxemia and hypercapnia during mask use in advanced disease. Existing studies in COPD at sea level report generally modest physiological effects with short-term mask use, but their small sample sizes and short exposure durations limit generalizability. This perspective highlights the urgent need for well-designed studies evaluating both acute and chronic physiological responses to prolonged mask use in COPD patients at high altitudes to inform evidence-based public health recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.