SynthesisFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Pharmacological vs. non-pharmacological interventions for anxiety control in dental implant surgery: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dental anxiety associated with dental implant surgery can adversely affect patient comfort, cooperation, and overall procedural outcomes. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are commonly employed to manage preoperative anxiety; however, their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. A systematic evaluation of these approaches is important to determine their relative benefits in terms of anxiety reduction, onset of action, safety profile, and patient acceptability. Existing evidence suggests that pharmacological interventions may provide rapid anxiolytic effects, whereas non-pharmacological approaches, such as relaxation techniques, mindfulness-based interventions, and audio distraction, may reduce anxiety without the potential adverse effects associated with medication use. Therefore, this systematic review aims to compare the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological anxiety control strategies in dental implant surgery and evaluate their clinical applicability in optimizing patient management. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the management of dental anxiety in adult patients undergoing dental implant surgery, up to September 2025. The systematic review was conducted according to a pre-specified protocol in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0). Results: The electronic database search identified a total of 225 articles related to anxiety management during dental implant placement. By evaluating titles, abstracts, and full texts, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria; however, no relevant studies were found through hand searching. The evidence suggested that that multimodal anxiety-reduction strategies, particularly dexmedetomidine sedation and behavioural distraction techniques, are effective in reducing dental anxiety during implant procedures. Conclusion: Both non-pharmacological and pharmacological anxiety management strategies demonstrate considerable potential in reducing dental anxiety during implant placement. Behavioural interventions, including effective communication, relaxation techniques, distraction methods, and complementary therapies, appear beneficial for patients with mild to moderate anxiety, whereas pharmacological sedation is particularly effective for managing moderate to severe dental fear, thereby enhancing patient cooperation, procedural comfort, and overall acceptance of implant therapy. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261376502, identifier CRD420261376502.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.