ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Temporal neural coupling: reconciling the Bobath concept with task-oriented training for post-stroke upper limb recovery-a perspective.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-stroke neurorehabilitation has long been shaped by a binary opposition between the Bobath concept and task-oriented training. The former emphasizes inhibition of aberrant patterns and facilitation of normative movement, while the latter prioritizes high-intensity, goal-directed repetition that may inadvertently reinforce compensatory strategies. This dichotomy persists largely because mechanistic frameworks capable of explaining their potential complementarity remain underdeveloped. This perspective article advances the hypothesis of temporal neural coupling. We propose that manual facilitation and postural preparation within the contemporary Bobath concept serve to optimize the spike-timing precision of descending corticospinal commands and the recruitment fidelity of spinal motor networks. This preparatory modulation establishes a low-entropy motor baseline and opens a permissive temporal window for inducing use-dependent long-term potentiation during subsequent task-specific practice. We argue that these modalities should not be viewed as discrete, sequentially administered phases. Rather, they constitute dynamically time-locked, synergistic components of a unified intervention strategy. The perspective article further outlines a future paradigm grounded in closed-loop neurofeedback, wherein real-time neurophysiological monitoring guides the precise, state-dependent orchestration of plasticity tailored to each patient's recovery trajectory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.