Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494405›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology

A narrative review of AI monitoring in postoperative pain management and functional rehabilitation for spinal cord injury.

Xiaoqing Zhang, Jianping Sheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiaoqing ZhangDepartment of Spinal Trauma, Shaoxing City Keqiao District TCM Hospital Medical Alliance General Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Jianping ShengDepartment of Spinal Trauma, Shaoxing City Keqiao District TCM Hospital Medical Alliance General Hospital, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe neurological condition often leading to significant disability, with causes including trauma, tumors, and spinal cord pathologies. Affected patients commonly present with limb motor dysfunction and persistent chronic pain. Current clinical management of SCI primarily relies on pharmacological and surgical interventions; however, neurological recovery remains limited due to the restricted neural regenerative capacity and the high costs associated with long-term rehabilitation, which together impose a substantial socioeconomic burden. AI monitoring, encompassing data acquisition and preprocessing, algorithmic modeling, real-time analysis, and decision support, offers the potential to continuously track vital signs, assess neurological function, and support pain management in patients with SCI through the integration of algorithms and real-time data analysis. Additionally, by facilitating the development of personalized rehabilitation plans, AI monitoring may enable more precise and dynamic postoperative management. Traditional post-SCI monitoring largely depends on subjective assessments and standardized interventions, which are often constrained by delayed responses and limited individual adaptation. As such, the integration of AI monitoring into the treatment process has attracted increasing attention from clinicians and researchers. This article aims to summarize the preliminary research progress and emerging applications of AI monitoring in postoperative pain management and functional rehabilitation for SCI, with the goal of providing a critical overview of its potential roles and current limitations in advancing post-SCI care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence monitoringmedical technologypain managementrehabilitation therapyspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID42494405
PMCPMC13393461

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.