ReviewFrontiers in neurology
A narrative review of AI monitoring in postoperative pain management and functional rehabilitation for spinal cord injury.
Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a severe neurological condition often leading to significant disability, with causes including trauma, tumors, and spinal cord pathologies. Affected patients commonly present with limb motor dysfunction and persistent chronic pain. Current clinical management of SCI primarily relies on pharmacological and surgical interventions; however, neurological recovery remains limited due to the restricted neural regenerative capacity and the high costs associated with long-term rehabilitation, which together impose a substantial socioeconomic burden. AI monitoring, encompassing data acquisition and preprocessing, algorithmic modeling, real-time analysis, and decision support, offers the potential to continuously track vital signs, assess neurological function, and support pain management in patients with SCI through the integration of algorithms and real-time data analysis. Additionally, by facilitating the development of personalized rehabilitation plans, AI monitoring may enable more precise and dynamic postoperative management. Traditional post-SCI monitoring largely depends on subjective assessments and standardized interventions, which are often constrained by delayed responses and limited individual adaptation. As such, the integration of AI monitoring into the treatment process has attracted increasing attention from clinicians and researchers. This article aims to summarize the preliminary research progress and emerging applications of AI monitoring in postoperative pain management and functional rehabilitation for SCI, with the goal of providing a critical overview of its potential roles and current limitations in advancing post-SCI care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.