Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494408›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology

The progress in predictive modeling of post-stroke epilepsy.

Hao Chen, Lei Ge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hao ChenCenter for Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lei GeCenter for Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine Research Institute of Zhejiang Province, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is a significant complication of both ischemic (IS) and hemorrhagic strokes (HS), leading to increased morbidity and reduced quality of life. Accurate prediction of PSE risk is essential for early intervention and tailored management. Multiple predictive models have been developed for different stroke subtypes. In HS, models such as CAVE, CAVS, CAV+, and CAVE2 emphasize lesion characteristics and early seizures. Within IS, models such as SeLECT and PSEiCARe focus on cortical involvement, large-artery atherosclerosis, and early seizure occurrence. Recent advances in machine learning-based approaches have shown improved predictive accuracy for both IS and HS patients, although further validation is required for routine clinical application. This review summarizes and compares predictive models for PSE across stroke subtypes, highlighting their clinical relevance and potential for improving patient outcomes through early risk stratification. Integration of multimodal data may further enhance seizure prediction and guide personalized intervention strategies.

Indexed as

assessmentmachine learningpost-stroke epilepsyrisk prediction modelsstroke

Identifiers

PMID42494408
PMCPMC13391263

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.