Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42494420›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2026

Erythrocyte-inspired biomaterials for cancer immunotherapy: Integration within the cancer-immunity cycle.

Parisa Javadi, Amir Azadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Parisa JavadiDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran.
Amir AzadiPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Erythrocyte-based drug delivery systems serve as an attractive strategy for cancer immunotherapy with improved biocompatibility, increased circulation time, and less immunogenicity. Due to their distinct physiological characteristics, erythrocytes can be developed as biomimetic carriers for targeted drug delivery, antigen presentation, and immune modulation. This review discusses the different strategies utilized to leverage erythrocytes in cancer immunotherapy, such as erythrocyte membrane-coated nanoparticles, antigen-hitchhiking systems, and immune-stimulatory erythrocyte-derived vesicles. Notably, we uniquely contextualizes erythrocyte-inspired platforms across each stage of the cancer-immunity cycle, highlighting their dual role as both drug delivery vehicles and active immunomodulators. We have explained how engineered erythrocyte-based systems enhance the cycle of cancer-immunity by increasing tumor antigen presentation and reshaping the tumor microenvironment for greater immune cell infiltration and cytotoxicity. In addition, recent advances in erythrocyte-based immunotherapeutic platforms, their advantages over conventional delivery platforms, and challenges in their clinical application are discussed. Overall, the integration of erythrocyte biomimetic technology into immunotherapy provides a novel approach to enhance cancer treatment efficacy and reduce systemic toxicity, paving the way for more targeted and effective therapies.

Indexed as

Biomimetic materialCancer-immunity CycleCancer immunotherapyErythrocyteImmunomodulation

Identifiers

PMID42494420
PMCPMC13392612

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.