ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Research progress on the effects of epidural electrical stimulation on lower extremity function in patients with spinal cord injury.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Trial to Chronic Epidural Electrical Stimulation: A Single-Patient Feasibility Study in Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lower extremity motor dysfunction after spinal cord injury (SCI) represents a major determinant of long-term disability and reduced quality of life. Although conventional pharmacotherapy and rehabilitation training may partially attenuate secondary injury and preserve residual function, their capacity to restore motor networks below the level of injury remains limited. In recent years, epidural electrical stimulation (EES), through targeted modulation of lumbosacral dorsal root afferents and local interneuronal circuits, has been shown to increase the excitability of spinal motor networks and augment residual descending input. Moreover, when integrated with task-specific training, EES has been associated with improvements in lower extremity motor functions, including standing, stepping, walking, and spasticity control. This study narratively reviews the pathophysiological basis of SCI, the neural mechanisms underlying EES, its clinical efficacy, combined therapeutic approaches, individualized parameter optimization, and current limitations. Available evidence, though currently limited by small sample sizes and study heterogeneity, indicates that EES may promote functional recovery in patients with chronic incomplete SCI and in a subset of those clinically classified as having "motor-complete" SCI; however, its therapeutic benefit is influenced by the complex interaction of multiple factors, including the integrity of spared pathways, the level of injury, stimulation parameters, electrode configuration, and rehabilitation intensity. Further progress is required, particularly in multicenter randomized controlled trials, standardized outcome assessments, closed-loop programming, and long-term safety evaluation, to support the translation of EES from an investigational neuromodulation strategy into a broadly applicable, precision-oriented rehabilitation modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.