ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Real-world safety profile of givinostat: an early post-marketing pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Givinostat is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2024 for treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). This early post-marketing pharmacovigilance study aimed to explore the adverse events (AEs) caused by givinostat through data mining of the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), and provide reference for clinical safety. Methods: Data of givinostat were collected from the FAERS database covering the period from the first quarter of 2024 to the fourth quarter of 2025. Disproportionality analyses were employed to quantify the associated AE signals of givinostat and detect the risk signals from the data in the FAERS database. Four algorithms, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), were used to detect the risk signals from the data in the FAERS database. The definition relied on system organ class (SOCs) and preferred terms (PTs) by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Results: In total, 402 reports of givinostat were identified as the "primary suspected (PS)" AEs. Givinostat-associated AEs were identified across 23 organ systems. Significant disproportionality PTs simultaneously meeting the criteria of all four algorithms. Expected AEs, including decreased platelet count, diarrhoea, and increased blood triglycerides, were identified. Unexpected significant signals such as lower limb fracture, femur fracture, anger, and mood swings were also detected, although these are likely heavily confounded by the underlying disease progression and concurrent corticosteroid use. Conclusion: Based on early post-marketing data, this study provides a preliminary real-world safety assessment of givinostat. In addition to validating known hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities, it identifies potential signals for orthopedic complications, psychiatric events, and hypertriglyceridemia. While these novel signals are heavily confounded by the natural history of DMD and chronic corticosteroid exposure, they warrant continuous multidisciplinary monitoring. As hypothesis-generating signals derived from spontaneous reports, these initial findings require future prospective validation. They expand the current understanding of givinostat's safety profile and highlight the necessity for continuous pharmacovigilance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.