SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Why pharmacogenomic biomarkers for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy fail: a systematic review of genetic associations, replication, and clinical translation.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common, dose-limiting toxicity of cancer treatment, yet reliable biomarkers to predict individual susceptibility remain lacking. Germline genetic variation has been widely investigated as a potential contributor to CIPN risk; however, the consistency and clinical utility of these associations remain unclear. We performed a systematic review of genetic association studies evaluating CIPN across neurotoxic chemotherapies. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched (April 2025) for human studies assessing germline variants in relation to clinician- or patient-reported CIPN. Eligible studies were identified in four major drug classes: vincristine, taxanes, platinum agents, and bortezomib. Study characteristics, phenotyping approaches, ancestry, and variant-level data were extracted, and study quality was assessed using Q-Genie. Meta-analysis was not performed due to substantial heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures. 72 studies were included, predominantly involving cohorts of European ancestry. The most consistently replicated loci were CEP72 and ETAA1 for vincristine-induced neuropathy; EPHA5, FGD4, and FZD3 for taxane-induced neuropathy; and ABC transporter genes and GSTP1 for platinum-induced neuropathy. For bortezomib, associations involving TRPV1, DNA repair pathways, and inflammatory signalling showed emerging but largely non-replicated evidence. Across studies, marked heterogeneity in CIPN definitions, phenotyping instruments, statistical approaches, and effect allele reporting limited comparability and reproducibility. Collectively, these findings indicate that current pharmacogenomic approaches to CIPN are constrained by poor replication, population bias, and inconsistent methodology, which hinder translation into clinically actionable biomarkers. Future progress will require harmonised phenotyping, multi-ancestry genome-wide studies, and integration of functional validation to enable robust risk stratification and precision oncology approaches to CIPN. Systematic Review Registration: Identifier PROSPERO [CRD42025635757].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.