ArticleVeterinary world2026
Effects of dietary inclusion of
Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: The rising costs and limited availability of conventional feed ingredients, particularly fishmeal and soybean meal, have prompted the exploration of alternative protein sources for sustainable laying duck production. Hermetia illucens larvae and Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) are locally available, protein-rich resources with considerable nutritional potential; however, their use in laying duck diets remains limited due to concerns about nutrient digestibility and feed efficiency. Supplementation with probiotics such as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens may improve nutrient utilization and support laying performance when unconventional feed ingredients are used. Therefore, this study evaluated the effects of dietary inclusion of an H. illucens larvae and P. canaliculata (HI-PCL) meal blend supplemented with B. amyloliquefaciens on the performance, egg quality, and economic efficiency of laying Mojosari ducks. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 laying Mojosari ducks aged 25 weeks were used in a 6-week feeding trial arranged in a completely randomized design with four dietary treatments and five replicates per treatment. The treatments consisted of different inclusion levels of an HI-PCL meal blend (80% HI and 20% PCL) in the diets: 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15%. All ducks received Results: Dietary inclusion of the HI-PCL meal blend significantly affected (p < 0.05) feed intake, egg production, egg weight, egg mass, FCR, yolk index, Haugh unit, yolk color, and IOFC. Ducks fed the 15% HI-PCL diet showed the best productive performance, with daily egg production of 72.38%, egg weight of 68.96 g, egg mass of 49.66 g/bird/day, and FCR of 3.14. Yolk color intensity also increased significantly at the 15% inclusion level. However, egg length and egg width were not significantly affected (p > 0.05) by dietary treatment. The highest IOFC value (Indonesian rupiah [IDR] 847,176.64) was recorded in the 15% HI-PCL treatment. Conclusion: Inclusion of a 15% HI-PCL meal blend supplemented with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.