ArticleVeterinary world2026
Selection of two pronuclei zygotes before electroporation does not improve gene editing efficiency or reduce mosaicism in porcine embryos despite optimized timing and Hoechst staining.
Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Electroporation-mediated delivery of Clustered-Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 components is an effective approach for genome editing in porcine embryos; however, mosaicism remains a major limitation. Selecting normally fertilized zygotes with two pronuclei (2PN) before electroporation may improve editing uniformity and reduce mosaicism. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of 2PN selection, optimized timing of pronuclear observation, and Hoechst 33342 staining conditions on embryo development and genome editing efficiency in porcine embryos. Materials and Methods: In the first experiment, pronuclear dynamics after Results: The proportion of zygotes with 2PN gradually increased after fertilization and reached the highest level (47.4%) at 20 h post-IVF before significantly declining at 24 h (p < 0.05). Among the staining conditions tested, treatment with 5 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 for 30 min resulted in the highest blastocyst formation rate (14.3%, p < 0.05). Following electroporation, blastocyst development rates did not differ significantly between the 2PN-selected group (6.5%) and the control group (10.8%). Similarly, the biallelic mutation rate and total mutation efficiency were comparable between selected zygotes (78.6% and 85.5%, respectively) and controls (81.8% and 92.5%, respectively). Conclusion: Selection of porcine zygotes with 2PN before electroporation did not improve genome editing efficiency or reduce mosaicism despite optimization of pronuclear observation timing and Hoechst staining conditions. The persistence of mosaicism may be associated with asynchronous DNA replication between maternal and paternal pronuclei. Although 2PN selection was safe for embryo development, additional strategies targeting pronuclear synchronization and replication timing are required to achieve more uniform genome editing in porcine embryos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.