ArticleOTO open
Incidence of Patulous Eustachian Tube Following Bariatric Surgery: An Observational Study at a Single Center.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the incidence of Patulous Eustachian Tube (PET) following bariatric surgery using standardized diagnostic criteria. Study Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary academic medical center in northern Mexico. Methods: Sixty-four adults undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy were enrolled from April 2024 to June 2025. Otological assessments were conducted preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 3 months postsurgery. PET diagnosis was determined using the Japan Otological Society (JOS) criteria. The Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire-7 (ETDQ-7) was administered at each visit. Weight loss parameters were recorded, and correlated with PET outcomes. Results: 64 enrolled patients, 12 were excluded, and 52 were analyzed. The mean patient age was 39.4 years (SD ± 10.7); 73.1% were women. Mean weight loss at 3 months was 22.8 kg (19.3% of initial body weight). No patients met criteria for definite PET at any time point. The proportion of patients with possible PET increased from 9.6% preoperatively to 23.1% at 3 months ( Conclusion: Despite significant weight loss, no confirmed cases of PET 3 months after bariatric surgery. These findings suggest that previously reported high PET incidence rates may reflect inconsistent diagnostic standards rather than true clinical pathology. Symptom-driven evaluation rather than routine PET screening may be more appropriate in the early postoperative period. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to assess long-term risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.