Evidence mapPaperPMID 42494763Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026

Curcumin and piperine in neurodegenerative disorders: a systematic review of preclinical neuroprotective evidence.

Minji Zhou, Xiyun Wang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Minji ZhouChinese Medicine Hospital of Tiantai County, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xiyun WangDepartment of Neurology, Tiantai People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province (Tiantai Branch of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital), Taizhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Curcumin and piperine are phytochemicals with neuroprotective potential; however, curcumin's limited bioavailability restricts its therapeutic efficacy. Increasing evidence suggests that their co-administration may provide synergistic neuroprotective benefits. This systematic review evaluates the current preclinical evidence for curcumin-piperine (CUR-PP) combinations in neurodegenerative disorder models. Methods: We searched electronic databases for studies published between 2010 and 2026. Twenty unique preclinical studies, involving rodent models and neuronal cell cultures, met the eligibility criteria. Due to substantial methodological heterogeneity in study designs, dosing regimens, and outcome measures, a quantitative meta-analysis was not feasible. Findings were synthesized qualitatively, focusing on behavioral, biochemical, and molecular outcomes. Results: CUR-PP co-administration consistently demonstrated superior neuroprotective efficacy compared to monotherapy. The combination significantly improved cognitive and locomotor performance, mitigated oxidative stress, and modulated neuroinflammatory pathways. Nanoformulations, such as PLGA nanoparticles, further enhanced bioavailability and therapeutic impact across the included studies. Conclusion: Preclinical data indicate that CUR-PP combinations exert synergistic neuroprotective effects, suggesting they are promising multi-target candidates for neurodegeneration. However, the therapeutic potential is currently limited by a reliance on preclinical models, substantial inter-study heterogeneity, and a total lack of clinical trial data, which prevents the establishment of validated human dosing protocols.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasecurcuminnanoformulationsneuroinflammationneuroprotectionoxidative stresspiperinesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42494763
PMCPMC13391397

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.