ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Machine learning for early screening of influenza A-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in hospitalized patients: a real-world study.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Influenza A-associated invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) is a severe fungal complication with high mortality, while early identification remains difficult because of nonspecific clinical manifestations. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model for early screening of IAPA in hospitalized influenza A patients. Methods: This retrospective single-center study enrolled 234 hospitalized influenza A patients from January 2023 to December 2025, including 59 patients with IPA. Eligible patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (70%) for model development and a validation cohort (30%) for internal validation. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of IAPA. Five machine learning algorithms, including Logistic Regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, and LightGBM, were constructed and compared to identify the most clinically applicable model for early screening. Results: Multivariate logistic regression identified seven independent predictors of IAPA, including smoking history, autoimmune disease, fibrinogen level, lymphocyte count, hemoglobin level, cumulative systemic corticosteroid dose, and corticosteroid treatment course of 8-28 days. Among the evaluated algorithms, LightGBM demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.76) in the validation cohort and was considered the most suitable model for early screening. The LightGBM model achieved an AUC of 0.800 (95% CI, 0.714-0.886), with a specificity of 0.69 and an accuracy of 0.68. Conclusion: LightGBM serves as a robust early-warning tool for identifying influenza A patients at high risk of IAPA. Utilizing routinely available clinical data, this model facilitates bedside risk stratification and early diagnostic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.