ReviewPain reports2026
A scoping review of music-based pain treatment mechanism research.
Review in Pain reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and mechanistic responses to a music-based intervention for pain in adults with irritable bowel syndrome: Protocol for a single-arm pilot study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A taxonomic framework of music-based intervention components to guide research: recommendations from the NIH U24 music research networks.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research supports the efficacy of music-based interventions (MBIs) for pain management, but understanding of their underlying mechanisms is lagging. This scoping review aims to map existing mechanism-focused MBI research, identify knowledge gaps, and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of this body of research. Studies were eligible if they tested a mechanism, moderator, or predictor of the effects of MBIs on clinical or experimental pain and were published in English in a peer-reviewed journal. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Scopus from inception through February 2026. Two reviewers completed screening and data extraction, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. From 663 records screened, 57 studies were included. Most studies employed experimental pain models with healthy volunteers. All but 4 studies examined the mechanisms of music audio recordings; the remaining studies examined active music-making. We identified convergent evidence for several candidate mechanisms, including positive emotional valence, cognitive agency, and sensorimotor synchronization. Evidence from neuroimaging studies point to the impact of music on early stages of pain processing as well as on higher-order cognitive and affective interpretation of pain. Finally, preliminary evidence suggests that music may restore default mode network connectivity involved in self-referential thoughts. Across studies, several methodological limitations constrained inferences. Future research should (1) employ rigorous designs that distinguish between competing mechanistic models and, when feasible, incorporate causal manipulations to test hypothesized mechanisms and (2) examine whether music influences pain processing differently in populations with vs without clinical pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.