ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Pelvic floor biomechanical reconstruction for moderate to severe pelvic organ prolapse: two-year outcomes of anatomical restoration and urinary continence.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the anatomical restoration, changes in urinary control function, and safety of pelvic floor biomechanical reconstruction in patients with moderate to severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 135 patients with POP-Q stage ≥ III who underwent pelvic floor biomechanical reconstruction between January 2022 and December 2023. Based on preoperative symptoms and urodynamics, patients were classified as occult stress urinary incontinence (OSUI, Results: All procedures were completed successfully. All POP-Q indicators improved significantly at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years compared with baseline (all Conclusion: Pelvic floor biomechanical reconstruction provides durable anatomical correction with favorable continence outcomes and low recurrence, with manageable morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.