ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Explainable multimodal AI and neuro-symbolic clinical decision support system for chronic eye disease management: a digital health implementation study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Administrative burden and documentation workload are increasingly recognized as major contributors to healthcare costs and clinician burnout, particularly in chronic disease management such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD). These non-clinical tasks reduce time available for patient care and introduce inefficiencies in coding, billing, and compliance workflows. This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and economic impact of an artificial intelligence-based system for automating administrative documentation in AMD care. Methods: A longitudinal proof-of-concept study was conducted in a tertiary ophthalmology network. A hybrid Neuro-Symbolic and Large Language Model (LLM) framework was developed to automate information extraction, clinical documentation structuring, and billing code validation. The system was applied to 24 de-identified unstructured clinical documents, including outpatient notes, operative reports, optical coherence tomography reports, and billing records. The processing pipeline included optical character recognition, knowledge-augmented LLM-based entity extraction, and neuro-symbolic rule-based validation to ensure clinical consistency, ICD-10/CPT coding accuracy, and reimbursement eligibility. Outputs were structured into standardized JSON clinical documentation formats. Results: The system achieved 98.3% accuracy in clinical entity extraction and 96.7% accuracy in administrative information extraction. Automated rule validation achieved 100% reimbursement compliance with no denied insurance claims. Mean documentation time per encounter decreased from 25.0 ± 5.0 min to 3.2 ± 1.1 min, representing an 88% reduction in documentation time. This resulted in an estimated labor cost saving of approximately 52 CNY (≈7 USD) per visit and projected annual savings of 42-56 USD per AMD patient under standard treatment schedules. Discussion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of integrating neuro-symbolic reasoning with large language models to automate administrative workflows in ophthalmology. The proposed system improves documentation efficiency, coding accuracy, and auditability while reducing hidden administrative costs. Although limited by a small sample size and single-center design, the framework provides a scalable and explainable architecture for AI-assisted administrative automation in digital health systems and chronic disease management. Conclusion: AI-enabled administrative automation using a neuro-symbolic and LLM framework has the potential to significantly improve operational efficiency and reduce costs in AMD care, supporting the development of sustainable and value-based digital healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.