ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2026
Intelligence on the graph: Graph neural networks for mechanistic drug target discovery.
Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug discovery is increasingly challenged by rising costs, long development cycles and high attrition rates, with accurate target identification remaining a critical bottleneck. Although artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated transformative potential, the systematic application of graph neural networks (GNNs) to drug target discovery remains underexplored. To address this gap, this paper provides a comprehensive and structured analysis of recent advances in GNN-based methods for drug-target interaction (DTI) and drug-target affinity (DTA) prediction. We dissect the methodological foundations of representative architectures including graph convolutional networks (GCNs), graph attention networks (GATs) and graph autoencoders (GAEs), and compare their mechanisms, advantages and applicable scenarios in modeling complex molecular and biological systems. Also, we synthesize frontier paradigms such as multimodal data fusion, high-order graph reasoning and dynamic GNNs, which enable the capture of atom-residue interactions, multi-target coordination mechanisms and cross-scale biological features. By systematically mapping methodological innovations to biological applications, this paper offers both theoretical guidance and translational insights. The key contributions of this paper include: (1) establishing a comparative framework that clarifies when and how different GNNs architectures can be applied in drug target discovery; (2) integrating cutting-edge paradigms rarely addressed in prior reviews, such as multimodal fusion and high-order graph modeling; and (3) highlighting representative case studies that bridge algorithmic innovation with practical drug discovery outcomes. Collectively, this work provides an authoritative and forward-looking reference, promoting the development of AI-driven, efficient and interpretable drug discovery pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.