SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
Psychological effects of music listening habits on emotional wellbeing and cognitive performance in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Music has long been incorporated into self-regulatory practices and rehabilitation programs. Despite growing evidence supporting its benefits, the comparative effects of routine music listening and systematic music-based therapeutic interventions on emotional and cognitive outcomes among adults have not yet been clearly established. This meta-analysis and systematic review summarized evidence on both types of exposures to explain their effects and important moderators. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020, Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO were searched up to March 2026, identifying 32 eligible studies (16 on music listening/receptive listening and 16 on music-based interventions) reporting emotional (anxiety, depression, stress, and well-being) and cognitive outcomes (global cognition, memory, executive function, and attention) in adults. The risk of bias was determined using ROBINS-I and RoB 2.0, whereas certainty of evidence was determined using GRADE. Results: Direction-of-effect tallies showed that almost no study reported worsening, with a clear predominance of emotional improvement across designs. Random-effects meta-analyses indicated small-to-moderate benefits of both listening and interventions for state anxiety, depressive symptoms, and emotional well-being, with slightly larger effects for structured programs. Music-based interventions produced small positive effects on global cognition, memory, and executive function, whereas attention effects were weaker and more heterogeneous. Meta-regression suggested that older age, clinical status, longer intervention duration, and active (versus purely receptive) formats were associated with stronger effects. The risk of bias was mostly low to moderate, and there was some evidence of small-study effects for emotional outcomes, leading to moderate overall certainty for emotional benefits and low-to-moderate certainty for cognitive benefits. Conclusion: These findings support music as a low-cost adjunct to promote emotional well-being and modestly support cognition, especially in older and clinical populations, while emphasizing the necessity of larger, rigorously controlled, mechanism-focused trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.