ReviewACS omega2026
Reprogramming the Tumor Oncobiosphere: Bioactive Nanohybrid Materials for Reversing Therapeutic Pseudo-Resistance.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress of siRNA Nanomedicines in Modulating the Microenvironment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumor resistance is increasingly recognized as a systems-level phenomenon emerging from the collective behavior of the tumor ecosystem rather than solely from cancer cell-intrinsic genetic alterations. Here, we define the oncobiosphere as a functionally integrated, multiscale system that extends beyond the tumor ecosystem by incorporating not only cellular and molecular interactions but also extracellular matrix (ECM)-driven biophysical constraints and transport dynamics that shape therapeutic accessibility. Within this environment, reciprocal biochemical and biomechanical interactions promote pro-survival signaling, immune exclusion, and physical barriers that restrict therapeutic access, giving rise to pseudoresistance despite the absence of classical resistance mutations. Key signaling axes including integrin-FAK, TGF-β, YAP/TAZ, STAT3, and Wnt/β-catenin converge to reinforce ECM remodeling, desmoplasia, and impaired drug penetration. These pathways stabilize a protective microenvironment through extrinsic feedback loops rather than intrinsic tumor adaptation. In this context, nanobiotechnology offers new opportunities to modulate stromal dynamics. Nanoengineered agents, such as nanoniclosamide (nano-NIC), and ECM-targeting delivery systems may disrupt pathological matrix remodeling and restore tissue permissiveness. By reprogramming the oncobiosphere, therapeutic resistance can be viewed as a reversible ecological state, opening avenues for more durable anticancer responses across treatment modalities.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.