ReviewCureus2026
Early Detection of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Narrative Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Remote Monitoring.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthracyclines remain central to the treatment of many malignancies, yet their use is limited by the risk of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC), a complication associated with substantial long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The occurrence of cardiotoxicity during cancer treatment may adversely affect both treatment success rates and patient survival, especially when dose reduction or premature discontinuation of anthracycline therapy is necessitated, leading to treatment discontinuity, reduced therapeutic efficacy, and overall reduced quality of life. While anthracyclines improve cancer outcomes, the resulting cardiac damage may lead to heart failure, disability, repeated hospitalizations, and premature death, with the long-term cardiovascular complications often becoming a greater determinant of survival than the original cancer itself. Growing understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying anthracycline cardiotoxicity has improved the recognition of patients at increased risk and clarified the progressive nature of this condition, which typically evolves from subclinical myocardial injury to left ventricular dysfunction and, if unrecognized, overt heart failure. Risk stratification has traditionally relied on cardiac imaging and circulating biomarkers. Although some current surveillance methods for cardiotoxicity monitoring detect myocardial damage at subclinical and partially or fully reversible stages, many traditional methods are relatively late markers and detect myocardial damage usually after it reaches a stage where treatment becomes unable to reverse the damage. The limitations of left ventricular ejection fraction as a sole monitoring parameter have prompted increasing use of more sensitive imaging markers and biochemical indicators of early myocardial injury. This review conducts a medical evaluation of AIC to study triggers, patient manifestations, and risk factors that develop during treatment. It evaluates present diagnostic methods, including echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and cardiac biomarkers, and investigates new methods that enable healthcare practitioners to detect diseases at their initial stages through artificial intelligence (AI)-based analytical tools, wearable technologies, and remote patient monitoring systems. Finally, we consider future directions aimed at earlier identification and personalized prevention of anthracycline-related cardiac dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.