ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2026
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cancer: from redox signaling and metabolic plasticity to therapeutic vulnerabilities.
Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are important regulators of cancer biology, acting as tumor-promoting signaling mediators and inducers of oxidative cell death. Oncogenic signaling, mitochondrial dysfunction, metabolic rewiring, and microenvironmental stress lead to increased basal ROS levels in cancer cells, resulting in a state of chronic oxidative pressure. Tumors develop adaptive antioxidant programs such as glutathione and thioredoxin, NADPH regeneration pathways, and sustained activation of the Nrf2-Keap1 axis to adapt to these conditions, leading to redox plasticity and "Nrf2 addiction" in some cancers. This adaptive rewiring allows malignant cells to sustain proliferative signaling while evading ROS-induced cytotoxicity and contributes substantially to therapeutic resistance. Despite the great promise of ROS-targeted therapies in preclinical studies, their translation into the clinic has been challenging for decades. Large antioxidant trials failed or even increased cancer risk. Many pro-oxidant therapies have limited efficacy due to a narrow therapeutic window, systemic toxicity, poor tumor selectivity, and a dynamic ability of tumors to reprogram antioxidant defenses. The significant intra-tumoral and spatial heterogeneity of redox status further complicates these constraints, where different tumor regions and cellular subpopulations exhibit different metabolic states, ROS thresholds, and sensitivities to ferroptosis. Emerging evidence indicates that ferroptosis, an iron-dependent cell death triggered by lipid peroxidation, is a significant therapeutic liability of redox-adapted tumors, particularly when antioxidant buffering systems like GPX4, system Xc
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.