ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2026
TogoMCP: natural language querying of life-science knowledge graphs via schema-guided LLMs and the Model Context Protocol.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Querying the RDF Portal knowledge graph maintained by DBCLS-which aggregates ~60 life-science databases-requires proficiency in both SPARQL and database-specific RDF schemas, placing this resource beyond the reach of most researchers. Large Language Models (LLMs) can, in principle, translate natural-language questions into executable SPARQL, but without schema-level context, they frequently fabricate non-existent predicates or fail to resolve entity names to database-specific identifiers. We present TogoMCP, a system that recasts the LLM as a protocol-driven inference engine orchestrating specialized tools via the Model Context Protocol (MCP). Two mechanisms are essential to its design: (i) the MIE (Metadata-Interoperability-Exchange) file, a concise YAML document that dynamically supplies the LLM with each target database's structural and semantic context at query time; and (ii) a two-stage workflow separating entity resolution via external REST APIs from schema-guided SPARQL generation. On a benchmark of 50 biologically grounded questions spanning five types and 23 databases, TogoMCP achieved a large improvement over an unaided baseline (Cohen's $d = 1.82$, Wilcoxon $P \lt .001$), with win rates exceeding 80% for question types with precise, verifiable answers. An ablation study shows that all component configurations deliver significant improvements, with MIE schema files providing the largest marginal contribution on mean per-question score ($\Delta = +0.50$ relative to a no-MIE condition, two-sided Wilcoxon $P = .067$; 90% bootstrap CI $[+0.04,\,\,+0.94]$ excludes zero); a one-line instruction to load the relevant MIE file recovers the same mean improvement as a full procedural protocol, while the protocol additionally reduces downside risk (loss rate 1.6% vs. 4.8%, Fisher $P = .036$). These results suggest a general design principle: concise, dynamically delivered schema context is more valuable than complex orchestration logic for mean score performance, while procedural guidance plays a complementary role in narrowing variance. Database URL: https://togomcp.rdfportal.org/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.