Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42496316›Full record

ArticleJournal of xenobiotics2026

Combined Effects of Metals and PFAS Exposure on Prevalent Diabetes.

Rifa Tasnia, Emmanuel Obeng-Gyasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of xenobiotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rifa TasniaDepartment of Built Environment, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-3658-4904
Emmanuel Obeng-GyasiDepartment of Built Environment, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3195-706X

Funding

U.S. National Science Foundation 2401878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and metal exposures occur as mixtures, but most studies evaluate them independently. Using data from adults in the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with directly measured PFAS and blood metals (N = 1648), we assessed joint associations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), lead, cadmium, and mercury with prevalent diabetes via survey-weighted logistic regression, Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression, quantile g-computation, and design-aware and naïve Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR). Survey-weighted diabetes prevalence was 11.4%. Lead and PFOS emerged as the dominant contributors to the exposure mixture in the BKMR model, with posterior inclusion probabilities of 1.00 and 0.997, respectively. In the WQS model, PFOS and PFOA were the primary drivers of the positive mixture index, consistent with their proposed roles in endocrine disruption and insulin resistance. BKMR exposure-response functions were non-monotonic, indicating that lead and cadmium associations with diabetes are nonlinear rather than uniformly directional across the exposure range, a structure that conventional logistic regression cannot capture. Overall, restricting to directly measured exposures, incorporating the full NHANES design in the primary regression, and triangulating across complementary mixture frameworks provide a more rigorous platform than prior single-pollutant or design-naive approaches.

Indexed as

Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR)diabetes prevalenceenvironmental chemical mixturesexposure mixture analysisheavy metalsPFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances)quantile g-computationweighted quantile sum (WQS) regression

Identifiers

PMID42496316
PMCPMC13398037

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.