Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42496669›Full record

SynthesisBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology2026

Deprescription of Psychotropics in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review of Guidelines and Development of a Deprescribing Algorithm.

Paul-Benoît Fargier, Mark Horowitz, Rodolphe Charles, Valérie Rousselon, Erik Fakra, Marie-Noëlle Beyens, Marie-Laure Laroche

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paul-Benoît FargierPharmacovigilance Centre, Saint-Étienne University Hospital, Saint-Étienne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8558-4600
Mark HorowitzResearch and Development Department, North East London NHS Foundation Trust, Ilford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1318-2029
Rodolphe CharlesInserm Clinical Investigation Center (CIC-EC 1408), North Hospital, Saint-Étienne University Hospital, Saint-Étienne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9143-8291
Valérie RousselonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, Loire Autism Assessment Unit, Saint-Étienne University Hospital, Saint-Étienne, France.
Erik FakraInserm Clinical Investigation Center (CIC-EC 1408), North Hospital, Saint-Étienne University Hospital, Saint-Étienne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3522-4584
Marie-Noëlle BeyensPharmacovigilance Centre, Saint-Étienne University Hospital, Saint-Étienne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5831-8957
Marie-Laure LarocheCentre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance Unit, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4344-0359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychotropics are increasingly prescribed in paediatrics despite limited evidence regarding their benefits and effectiveness. Although deprescribing approaches are established in adults, structured paediatric strategies remain poorly defined.

aimsTo identify and evaluate clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) on psychotropic deprescribing in youth, to describe and discuss recommendations regarding when and how to deprescribe in practice.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature (2015-2025). Two reviewers independently screened and evaluated the quality of the guidelines (AGREE II). We derived from this a psychotropic deprescribing algorithm in youth, supplemented with clinical expertise.

resultsAmong the 1390 records identified, none strictly met the methodological criteria for formal CPGs. Nevertheless, we assessed two papers that provided practical deprescribing recommendations and shared several characteristics with CPGs. One systematic review focused on antidepressant discontinuation, recommending tapering after remission with gradual dose reduction and monitoring to distinguish withdrawal from relapse. One narrative review provided child-specific guidance for stimulants, recommending reassessment and possible discontinuation after 1 year of stability. Both were rated as 'moderate' using the AGREE II tool and provided limited practical detail on stepwise deprescribing procedures.

conclusionCritical gap and urgent need for paediatric-specific deprescribing guidelines. We propose an expert-informed stepwise deprescribing algorithm.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeprescriptionsPractice Guidelines as TopicPsychotropic DrugsAdolescentChildHumansPsychotropic Drugsclinical practice guidelinesdeprescribingpaediatricspsychotropic medicationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42496669
PMCPMC13398396

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.