ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Functional Dentition Life Expectancy (FDLE): a novel indicator for monitoring oral health in ageing populations.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo introduce and apply Functional Dentition Life Expectancy (FDLE) as an indicator integrating tooth retention with longevity, alongside Edentulism-Free Life Expectancy (EFLE), using Chile as a case study. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study applied FDLE and compared its performance with EFLE as population oral health indicators. Using data from the Chilean National Health Survey 2016-2017 (n = 5,516) and national life tables. Survey-weighted estimates of mean tooth count and the prevalence of edentulism and functional dentition (≥ 20 teeth) were calculated by age, sex, and educational level. EFLE and FDLE were then estimated by sex using the Sullivan method, integrating age-specific oral health prevalences with mortality data.
resultsTooth retention declined markedly with age. Women and individuals with lower educational attainment experienced earlier and more severe tooth loss. Although women had higher life expectancy than men at all ages, they lived fewer years with functional dentition and more years edentulous. At ages 60-64, men were expected to live 19.7 years, including 15.6 years edentulism-free and 5.3 years with FD, whereas women had a life expectancy of 23.2 years but only 14.2 years edentulism-free and 3.9 years with FD. FDLE declined earlier than EFLE, indicating a prolonged period of non-functional dentition preceding edentulism.
conclusionFDLE reveals substantial years lived with compromised oral function, underscoring the need to ensure access to restorative care and establish explicit tooth retention goals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: FDLE offers a meaningful indicator to advocate for long-term preservation of natural teeth, monitor population oral health, inform policy, and set measurable goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42496732What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.