ArticleFamilial cancer2026
Brief report: attitudes and barriers toward genetic testing in pleural mesothelioma: a nationwide Italian survey.
Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a malignancy with a relevant genetic component, with germline mutations identified in up to 12% of cases. International guidelines recommend universal germline testing; however, its implementation in routine clinical practice remains inconsistent. This nationwide survey aimed to assess current clinical practice, attitudes, and barriers related to genetic testing among Italian specialists within the Mesothelioma Team Italy (MET-I) network. A 24-item questionnaire was distributed to MET-I members in 2025, exploring access to testing, clinical use, and perceived obstacles to both germline and somatic DNA sequencing. Forty-five physicians responded (53.6%). Although access to germline testing was relatively high (77.8%), only 6.7% of respondents routinely recommended it. Conversely, somatic NGS was widely available (95.6%) and primarily used for clinical trial screening (66.7%). The main barriers to germline testing included costs (62.2%), limited access to genetic counseling (51.1%), and insufficient physician awareness (48.8%). Despite the availability of genetic testing technologies, germline genetic testing in PM is underutilized in Italy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.