Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42496792›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026

Prebiotics and probiotics in animal nutrition: implications for food safety, sustainability, and circular production systems.

João Victor Dos Anjos Almeida, Julia Memrava Cabrera, Mauro de Medeiros Oliveira, Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza Oliveira, Alessandro M Varani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

João Victor Dos Anjos Almeida *School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1255-5831
Julia Memrava Cabrera *School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. julia.memrava@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1774-7592
Mauro de Medeiros OliveiraSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2048-6664
Ricardo Pinheiro de Souza OliveiraSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8590-804X
Alessandro M VaraniSchool of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Sao Paulo State University (Unesp), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. alessandro.varani@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8876-3269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pursuit of sustainable and efficient animal production systems has intensified global interest in microbiota-targeted nutritional strategies. This review synthesizes current research on prebiotics and probiotics, selectively utilized microbial substrates and beneficial live microorganisms, respectively, that confer health benefits, across major livestock and aquaculture sectors, including poultry, swine, ruminants, fish, and shrimp. It examines the fundamental role of host-specific gut microbiomes in regulating health and productivity and elucidates how prebiotics, alone or in synergistic formulations with probiotics, modulate these microbial communities. Mechanisms of action involve enhanced nutrient digestibility, improved intestinal morphology and barrier integrity, selective stimulation of beneficial bacteria (e.g., Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium), suppression of pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli, Salmonella, Vibrio), and potentiation of innate and humoral immune responses. Consistent evidence demonstrates that microbiota-targeted interventions improve key zootechnical indicators, including weight gain, feed conversion ratio, and carcass quality, while enhancing animal welfare and resilience to environmental and physiological stressors. A pivotal finding is their ability to reduce reliance on antimicrobial agents, addressing antibiotic resistance and aligning with consumer demand for ethical and natural production systems. Furthermore, this review highlights the valorisation of agro-industrial by-products (e.g., fruit pomace, cereal brans) and novel substrates such as Hermetia illucens (black soldier fly) as functional, cost-effective sources that embed animal nutrition within a circular bioeconomy framework. By integrating multidisciplinary findings from terrestrial and aquatic species, this review concludes that microbiota-based functional nutrition is indispensable for advancing next-generation sustainable animal production, uniting productivity, environmental stewardship, and animal welfare while supporting safe, ethical, and climate-resilient food systems worldwide.

Indexed as

Animal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaFood SafetyPrebioticsProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsAquacultureGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLivestockPrebioticsFeed additivesFood safetyLivestock nutritionMicrobiota modulationOne Health

Identifiers

PMID42496792
PMCPMC13400549

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.